Asset Tracing in Iran & Precautionary Measures: Pre-award Steps for Claimants Facing Iranian Counterparties

Share this article

When a claimant is preparing to bring a claim against an Iranian counterparty, early action can make the difference between recovery and frustration. The topic of asset tracing in Iran, securing interim or pre-award freezing orders against Iranian counterparties, and deploying effective pre-award measures is critical. In this article, the team at MJK Law Firm outlines a fast checklist for pre-award preservation, explores open-source intelligence and cross-border tracing techniques, shows where interim relief may be available outside Iran, and discusses the interaction with sanctions and banking limits. We also provide a vendor checklist for forensic firms and process servers to support your recovery strategy.

1. Legal Definitions and Framework

What is asset tracing?

Asset tracing is the process of identifying and locating assets of a debtor (in this context, a party in Iran or with Iranian links) to preserve them, secure them, or enforce them. On the practical level, this may involve tracking bank accounts, real estate, corporate shareholdings, shell companies, and other value-holding vehicles.

What are freezing orders (pre-award measures)?

A freezing order is a court-ordered injunction that restrains the defendant from disposing of or dealing with assets pending the outcome of litigation. In the context of a claim against an Iranian counterparty, pre-award freezing orders might be sought in jurisdictions that permit such interim relief. One leading summary of the law explains that the applicant must show (i) a good arguable case, (ii) a risk of dissipation of assets, and (iii) that it is just and convenient to grant the injunction.

Why Iran-specific?

Working with Iranian counterparties introduces additional layers of complexity: Iranian sanctions regimes, cross-border banking restrictions, state-owned or partially state-owned entities, and difficulties in enforcing or obtaining recognition of judgments within Iran. For example, the Iranian sanctions regulations highlight that foreign financial institutions face restrictions when dealing with Iranian counterparties.

2. Pre-Award Preservation: A Fast Checklist for Claimants

Before launching full litigation or arbitration, the following checklist helps claimants preserve their prospects of recovery when dealing with an Iranian counterparty:

✅ 1. Immediate asset-preservation steps

Identify and list the Iranian entity/entity structure you are dealing with (legal name in English and Farsi, registration number, shareholders, beneficial owners).
Effect a “global freeze analysis” – consider whether you need freezing orders in jurisdictions where the counterparty or its assets are present.
Issue freeze/attachment warnings (in venues that accept them) to alert the counterparty to the risk of dissipation.
Place holds on known assets (real estate, vehicles, bank accounts) via local counsel: e.g., via provisional attachment in Iran or elsewhere, if available.
Obtain disclosure of assets where possible through local discovery or asset-tracing firms.

✅ 2. Open-source intelligence & cross-border tracing techniques

Use corporate registers, beneficial-ownership databases, and global registry platforms.
Employ forensic accounting/investigative firms to trace hidden companies, offshore holding vehicles, and layers of ownership.
Review publicly available sanctions lists to identify whether the Iranian counterparty or its affiliates are designated, which often increases the risk of dissipation.
Monitor suspicious transactions, shell-company movements, and related-party disclosures.
Map out the counterpart’s network: parent companies, subsidiaries, key personnel, and jurisdictions of operation.

✅ 3. Take immediate interim relief outside Iran

Because enforcing measures within Iran can be complex or delayed, consider securing interim relief in “safe-haven” jurisdictions:

Identify jurisdictions where the counterparty has assets or operations.
Seek pre-award freezing orders/attachments in those jurisdictions (subject to local law).
Use foreign ancillary relief procedures to “pierce the corporate veil” of non-transparent Iranian structures.

Consider service of process and jurisdictional hurdles early: determine the best forum for post-award enforcement.

✅ 4. Sanctions, banking limits, and compliance overlay

Confirm whether the Iranian counterparty or any affiliate is on the List or subject to sanctions: transactions involving them may trigger blocking sanctions.
Determine whether funds held abroad can be freely transferred or are subject to the “special-purpose account” or other restrictions under the Iranian sanctions regime.
Be aware that freezing orders or attachments may implicate correspondent-banking relationships: banks may refuse to deal with Iranian-linked funds even absent formal sanctions.
Document compliance steps and safe-harbour investigations: this strengthens your position and mitigates the risk of sanctions-related disruption.

✅ 5. Vendor checklist for forensic firms & process-servers

When selecting vendors to support your tracing and enforcement strategy, checklist items include:

Forensic investigation firm: must have cross-border Iran/ME expertise, capability to access Iranian corporate and banking-related data (often via dual-national investigators or local network).
Process-server / asset-service firm: must be able to effect service or asset freeze/attachment notices in relevant jurisdictions (including in Iran if needed).
Legal counsel in Iran: must be versed in Iranian court procedures, methods of provisional attachment (if any), and local recognition/enforcement issues.
Banking compliance adviser: to assess sanctions exposure, bank-routing issues, transfer risk, and fund-flow tracing.
Data-room/document-management vendor: for secure hosting of traced asset data, chain-of-custody logs, due diligence records.

3. Where to Seek Interim Relief Outside Iran

Why outside Iran?

Because the Iranian legal system faces structural and practical challenges for rapid pre-award asset seizure (e.g., limited transparent asset registers, state-entity immunity, sanctions constraints), claimants often look to jurisdictions where the counterparty has assets and where robust interim relief is available.

Practical tips

Map the location of counterparty assets first (bank accounts, real estate, trading vehicles, subsidiaries).
Choose the jurisdiction where you can show jurisdiction, presence of assets, and risk of dissipation.
Ensure you move quickly: interim relief is time-sensitive and requires meeting standard criteria (good arguable case, risk of dissipation, just and convenient).
Maintain confidentiality: often, freezing applications are made ex parte (without the counterparty’s knowledge) to prevent tipping off asset dissipation.

4. Common Mistakes & Risks + MJK Law Firm’s Approach

Common mistakes and how claimants trip up

Waiting too long: Delaying asset-tracing until after a judgment means assets may vanish or be transferred to hidden entities.
Focusing only on Iran: Failing to consider cross-border asset locations (offshore companies, foreign bank accounts) means major pools of value may be overlooked.
Ignoring sanctions impact: Not assessing how sanctions affect funds/flows, or mis-evaluating bank risk, can lead to frozen efforts or blocked transfers.
Selecting the wrong forum for interim relief: Without jurisdiction or asset presence, freezing applications fail.
Vendor gaps: Using investigation/planning vendors without Iran-specific expertise can lead to ineffective tracing.

MJK Law Firm’s methodology

At MJK Law Firm, we take a three-stage approach:
Stage 1 – Rapid asset-snapshot and risk-portal review. Within days of engagement we deploy open-source intelligence and vendor network to map the counterparty, its asset footprint, sanctions-status, and global exposure.
Stage 2 – Interim relief strategy and freezing-order packaging. We advise on jurisdictions for pre-award relief, assist forensic investigators and process-servers, draft applications for freezing/attachment in appropriate venues, and align compliance with sanctions/bank-flow risks.
Stage 3 – Enforcement readiness and post-judgment execution. We develop enforcement pathways (including within Iran if needed), coordinate with local Iranian counsel, maintain a chain-of-custody for forensic work-product, and advise on how to leverage the freezing measures into full recovery.

We emphasise early mobilization, cross-border reach, and compliance awareness, thereby maximising the chance of preserving and realising value.

FAQ

Q1: Can I obtain a freezing order in Iran against an Iranian company before judgment?
A: Pre-award freezing orders in Iran are less straightforward compared to some common law jurisdictions. Iran’s legal system provides provisional measures (for example attachment of assets) but the mechanics are more limited and may take longer. Therefore, claimants facing Iranian counterparties often look to jurisdictions where the counterparty has foreign-based assets for interim relief.

Q2: If the Iranian counterparty moves funds offshore or via shell companies, how do I trace them?
A: Open-source intelligence plus forensic accounting are key. Investigative firms will map beneficial owners, track the chain of transactions, identify offshore holding vehicles and monitor for red flag movements. Early tracing gives you a better chance of identifying and freezing such assets before dissipation.

Q3: Do sanctions screening apply to my recovery efforts when dealing with Iranian entities?
A: Yes. Even though you may be the claimant, banks or jurisdictions may refuse to handle funds involving Iranian-linked counterparties due to sanctions risk. You must assess whether the counterparty or affiliates are designated, whether any transactions could trigger secondary sanctions, and document your compliance steps.

Q4: What if the Iranian counterparty has no assets in jurisdictions where freezing orders apply?
A: In that scenario, the strategy becomes one of building strong asset-tracing intelligence, negotiating with the counterparty for interim settlement, or looking to enforce a judgment later within Iran (or against Iranian-linked assets abroad). Nonetheless, even minimal foreign presence may warrant a freezing application if assets can be located quickly.

Q5: How can MJK Law Firm assist me in these matters?
A: At MJK Law Firm we specialise in debt-recovery, cross-border enforcement and tracing involving Iran-linked counterparties. We can assist with preliminary asset-tracing, advising on freezing-order strategy, sanctions compliance, coordinating forensic and service vendors, and planning post-judgment enforcement both abroad and within Iran’s legal system.

Call to Action

If you are facing a claim scenario involving an Iranian counterparty, early action is essential. Contact our team at MJK Law Firm to conduct a pre-award asset-tracing and precautionary strategy review. Our specialists can guide you through the complex interplay of tracing, freezing orders, and sanctions so you can maximise your recovery prospects. Contact an Iranian-law specialist at MJK Law Firm today.